Memory
Stanley Kunitz deliberately oriented the basement studio in his Provincetown summer home so that his desk faced out through a window onto two swollen mounds: one a pile of decomposing seaweed, the other a compost heap.
In “The Round,” he wrote, So I am sitting in semi-dark/hunched over my desk, with nothing for a view/ to tempt me/but a bloated compost heap, steamy old stinkpile/under my window/
It is revealing, I think, that Kunitz saw the compost heap, the stinkpile, as something that would tempt him, attract and engage him. The decaying mass nourished not only the poet’s garden soil but his consciousness as well, reminding him of the continuous cycles of the universe.
Poets do create out of compost. The garbage heap is where the steamy work gets done. Things sit, disintegrate and break down and then are transformed into fertile matter out of which new life is nourished and rises. This cyclic alchemy is always at work in nature and in life. Vietnamese Zen master and poet Thich Nhat Hanh writes that the flower and the garbage inter-are. The flower is becoming the garbage and the garbage is becoming the flower. If we look deeply we can see one in the other.
The garbage heap is the alluvial sludge that writers mine for material. We call it memory.
Scientists tell us that memory is inscribed on the cortex of the brain, stored in our cells. Poets are more lyrical. Oliver Wendell Holmes called it a net. I think of memory as a sponge, the repository of everything we have ever dreamed, smelled, seen, heard and tasted. It holds our hopes and dreams, failures and successes. Our wild imaginings. Excitations. Passions. Amorphous illusions and concrete experiences. Memory is creative work, built of slippery truth and mythic fantasy, confusion and tangled imaginings, all mutated by time
Always we are absorbing. Perpetually, in the compose heap, memories are being consumed, digested and assimilated. Out of it, grow the blossoms of creation. We take a memory and imagine it fully which in turn adds to the bank of remembrances. One sparks another. Both inter-are. There is a direct and kenetic relationship between memory and imagination.
That is why writers count memory among their most valuable tools. It is why we keep journals. The smallest thing – a fragment of a conversation, a remembered smell, a name, one object from the past – is enough to stoke the creative mind. “Memory,” says writer Amy Tan, “feeds imagination.” We have only to take the sponge and squeeze the good stuff out.
All of my novels were born in memory. One was built on a haunting story I heard at dinner one night when I was ten. Imagine holding on to a tale for decades before releasing it in the form of a novel. Another book was built on an image of an exhibit at a museum. A third on the morning recollection of a dream. Still another on a remembered newspaper headline. Another on the cellular memory of a profound loss.
Try this. Take a piece of paper and write the words, “I remember.” Then fill the page with things you remember. Out of deep recesses of the cortex, reminiscences surface.
I remember the calluses on my father’s hands; the first time I swallowed seawater; drinking buttermilk at my grandmother’s house; hearing my neighbors fight; Ellis Island; hunger.
Now add an additional word or phrase: “I remember holding…,” “I remember smelling…,” “I remember the first time I ….”
This exercise is a sure cure for the sterile thing we call writer’s block. Retrieve a memory from the list and enlarge it. Embroider and expand it. If it shifts to the sphere of fiction, relax any concern about holding to the literal truth. Just follow where it leads. This is how we write. We go to the workspace and the play yard we call memory. We swim there. We dive. We learn again how to create. We pay attention to what we’ve stored. We discover that often a memory that makes us want to run in the other direction is the stuff out of which powerful writing comes.
We till our compost into the garden of imagination.
And we remember to give thanks.
